June 2012


Theology and Culture and The Church and Discipleship30 Jun 2012 07:54 am

flag

Would you describe yourself as patriotic?

The word “patriot” is a derivative of a Greek word that essentially means “of one’s fathers” (as in “forefathers”). In a more general sense, the Greek word from which we derive the word “patriotic” means “relating closely to those of one’s country.”

Based upon this foundational etymology, I feel very comfortable describing myself as “patriotic.” Even as I type these words, for example, I am cognizant of my profound gratitude for my forefathers and foremothers who sacrificed much—some their very lives—to create a land of liberty and hope. I am even more grateful that, in those seasons of moral blindness and failure, when America accommodated incomprehensible evils such as slavery, slaughter, and civil war, the nobler impulses at the heart of our nation’s identity inspired new and, at times, countercultural patriots to stand against accepted atrocities until others began to recognize the truth of their prophecy.

One of my dearest friends (who happens to be a soldier) has experienced several lengthy deployments in recent years. When I look into his eyes (and the eyes of his family), I am instantaneously reminded of the fact that patriots are alive and well. My friend, and thousands like him, are willingly placing themselves in harm’s way all around the world, laboring sacrificially for the freedom and integrity that America, at its best, dares to champion.

I am free to write these paragraphs on my own personal blog only because of those past patriots who have gone before me and those current patriots who protect me. I feel inseparably connected to their character and am ever grateful for their bravery. In short, their spirit of patriotism inspires me to love my country, its ideals, and its nobler principles.

I hope that what I have just written will help you to understand with greater sensitivity what I’m about to write.

As much as I love my country and as deeply as I respect its flag, I am frequently concerned about the church’s willingness (and perhaps even eagerness) to generate what I perceive to be a dangerous fusion of patriotism and discipleship. In the American church’s zeal to create what might be described as a nationalistic spirituality—a spirituality in which one can carry a cross in one arm and an American flag in the other—we have produced a “theology of the state” in which discipleship to Jesus Christ is inappropriately measured by the degree to which it produces good Americans (good citizens).

I am not suggesting, of course, that good discipleship and good citizenship are mutually exclusive. After all, history has proven time and time again that cross-carrying has a way of producing humble and selfless people (which has been crucial in the development of America’s moral center). My concern, however, is that Jesus never called people to a governmentally-defined citizenship. Nor did he establish the church as a bastion of nationalism. Rather, Jesus called (and calls) us into a new Kingdom—one that doesn’t negate our national identity but transcends it, thereby helping us to live in a transformed relationship with both nation and world.

Put simply, in the Kingdom inaugurated by the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, the water of baptism is thicker even than the blood of the patriots. In that regard, our covenant relationship with the Christ-follower in Iraq is more defining for us than our connection with the American agnostic who is living right next door.

This Sunday, many churches will not think very deeply about the complexity and the importance of these realities. All across the land, American flags will be an eagerly-accepted portion of Sunday’s liturgical environment, as will be the pledge of allegiance and, in some cases, the national anthem. Am I suggesting that this is somehow unforgivable or unredeemable? Of course not. I do pray, however, that, during its 4th of July services, the Church does not lose sight of the fact that Trinitarian worship always bears witness to the Way of Christ—a Way that cannot be linked to any one nation’s interests nor contained by any one nation’s boundaries.

Back in the early 1990’s, I served a church in North Carolina that was 9 miles north of Fort Bragg. The congregation there was replete with current and former soldiers. The spirit of patriotism in that place was understandably strong, as was evidenced by the large American flag that was prominently located just inches from the altar.

One day, a faithful member of that church came to see me in the sanctuary. She was the well-educated, fifty-four-year-old wife of a career military man, and she was every bit as patriotic as her husband was. That day in the sanctuary, she was troubled about something.

After some pleasant conversation, she arrived at the heart of the matter. “I want to tell you something,” she said to me, “and I don’t want you to judge me for saying it.”

“O.K.,” I responded. “I promise that I won’t judge you.”

“Well,” she said, “it really troubles me to have THAT in our sanctuary.” She pointed to the altar space.

“Do you mean the altar,” I asked.

“No,” she said, “not the altar. The flag. I want you to know that, every Sunday, it bothers me to have the American flag so close to our altar.”

I had never encountered this sentiment before. I was momentarily dumbfounded and speechless.

“Don’t get me wrong,” she said. “I love my country and its flag. I really do. My husband has spent his entire life in the military because he loves this country so deeply and I’m proud of him for doing that. In fact, I can’t sing a single verse of ‘My Country ‘Tis of Thee’ without weeping.”

“O.K.,” I said, “so what’s the problem with the flag?”

“Well,” she said, “my husband and I have lived all over the world because of his military service. That means that I have friends all over the world. My two very best friends are from Germany and Italy. They come to visit me every year.”

I still wasn’t getting the point.

“When they come to visit me,” she continued, “I want them to come to church with me, since both of them are faithful Christians.”

All that I could think to do in the moment was to affirm her desire to invite people to church!

“Don’t you get it,” she said to me. “When I bring my German and Italian friends to this church, I want them to see the cross and the pulpit and the Bible and the stained-glass windows. But I don’t want them to see the American flag and the altar right next to one another.”

“Why would that be such a problem,” I asked.

“Because,” she said, “by putting them right next to one another, we change the meaning of both the cross and the flag. The flag can help us to remember our national identity, which is really important to me. But the cross is bigger than that. The cross is about salvation. It’s about eternal life. It’s about the whole world.”

She paused to reflect upon what she had just said.

“I guess it’s like this,” she continued. “When my foreign Christian friends walk into my church’s sanctuary, I don’t want them to feel like foreigners any more. I want them to feel like they’ve come to a home away from home. I want them to know that they are part of us.”

That conversation, which made its way into the journal that I kept at the time, initiated a struggle within me that continues even to this day. It is a struggle to discern the nature of patriotism, the nature of discipleship, the difference between the two, and the dangers of synthesizing them too quickly. I don’t want it to be a struggle that alienates those of you who might disagree with me on this issue. But I do want it to be a redemptive struggle—one that compels me to think more clearly about everything from nationalism to liturgical imagery.

At any rate, that conversation from the early 1990’s is part of the reason why my favorite patriotic hymn is “This Is My Song.” It is a hymn that enables me to be patriotic enough to acknowledge that “this is my home, the country where my heart is; here are my hopes, my dreams, my holy shrine.”

At the same time, the hymn helps me to guard against nationalistic idolatry by forcing me to remember that “other hearts in other lands are beating with hopes and dreams as true and high as mine.”

May God bless America where it warrants a divine blessing. May God bless all the world’s nations in the same fashion. And may God bless the Church around the world as it continues to bear witness to the Kingdom in which our defining citizenship is to be found.

Theology and Culture and Music15 Jun 2012 07:40 pm

the shins
One of my core theological convictions is that humankind has been created with an innate desire for relationship and meaningful connection. No matter whether one is an introvert or extrovert, a homebody or a social butterfly, somewhere beneath the layers of one’s unique personality beats the heart of a very particular desire—a desire to know and to be known, to love and to be loved. It is precisely this relational impulse that inspires the cultivation of friendships and romance, the accommodation of spontaneous conversation and impromptu interaction, and, most certainly, the pursuit of authentic community.

As a Christ-follower, I conceptualize this ontological impulse toward relationship in a very particular fashion. I see it as nothing less than a portion of the Imago Dei—the Image of God—finding expression in the nooks and crannies of the human pilgrimage. An atheist or an agnostic humanist, by contrast, may be inclined to interpret the human desire for connection as the inevitable flourishing of a functional socialization or an outgrowth of one’s biologically-fueled emotional yearnings. For the Christ-follower, however, humankind’s relational proclivities are something more than anthropological happenstance. In fact, among people of faith, these relational proclivities are seen as nothing less than the handiwork of a relentlessly-relational God who breathed into us, not only a breath of life, but also a yearning for intimacy.

Not long ago, I encountered a song that has helped me to think even more deeply about the urgency and theological significance of humankind’s hunger for connection. While the song to which I am referring did not emerge from a specifically Christocentric perspective, it speaks volumes about our culture’s attentiveness to a spiritual longing that can be felt even when it cannot be named: a longing for transformational intimacy and holistic relationship.

“The Shins” is an American indie rock band that has been around since the mid-1990’s. The band’s recently-released album, “Port of Morrow,” is as lyrically clever as it is musically compelling. For me, the high mark of the album is the hauntingly evocative song, “September.” (To watch the video for “September,” click HERE.) Written by James Mercer (The Shins’ lead vocalist and guitarist), “September” calls to mind a love relationship that is transitioning from playfulness to profundity—or, as the song’s title suggests, a love that is moving from summer breeziness to autumnal complexity.

“September” begins in the strange territory of ancient Greece:

Into this strange elastic world
Pontus kindly gave up a pearl
Of his eternal stone and mud
Ain’t she lovely bone and blood

“Pontus” (Greek for “sea”) is a term that has both geographical and mythological significance. Geographically, Pontus was a region on the southern coast of the Black Sea. Mythologically, Pontus was a Greek pre-Olympian sea God. The reference to Pontus giving up “a pearl” is a clear reference to Aphrodite who, we are told, emerged as a pearl from the foam of the sea.

The exaggerated imagery tells us that the love relationship at the heart of this song is not to be taken lightly. In the eyes of the songwriter, the relationship about which he writes is the stuff of divinity and mythological grandeur. Far from a maudlin overture, these words reflect the heart of a contemplative lover who recognizes that this “strange elastic world” has pulled him into a relationship that seems to be imbued with an eternal significance.

Born of the sea
A thousand miles away from me
A court of angels, a ward of the sun
A future forming, a curse undone

Who is this one who has been “born of the sea, a thousand miles away from me?” Is it Aphrodite? Or is the songwriter speaking now of some other “goddess” he has grown to love? Could the songwriter be moving from ancient Greece to present day?

These lyrics compel us to visualize the people with whom we share intimate relationship—the people we love, the people we trust. The lyrics draw our thoughts to the people in our journey who have emerged from the sea of our shared humanness in order to become a “ward of the sun” for us. Their lives shine upon ours, thereby undoing the “curse” of isolation and ushering us into a “future forming.”

Under our softly burning lamp she
Takes her time
Telling stories of our possible lives
And love is the ink in the well when her body writes

Perhaps the deepest portion of the human hunger for relationship is the desire for some new narrative that will bring to us a fresh way of telling the story of what our life means. Holistic relationship has a way of generating new stories, new poetry, new energizing narratives. The songwriter evokes this reality when he speaks of a loved one who concerns herself with “telling the stories of our possible lives” and writing those stories with the mystical ink found in the well of a devoted heart.

I’ve been selfish and full of pride
She knows deep down there’s a little child
But I’ve got a good side to me as well
And it’s that she loves in spite of everything else

Can one ever dare to love another without an ever-deepening attentiveness to one’s own brokenness and failure? Such honest self-inventory is part of the very nature of authentic love, is it not? Authentic love unsettles, inspiring both an honest confession and a passionate desire for sanctification—a passionate desire, in other words, to become something better than what we are. We seek this sanctification, not because we feel compelled to earn the love of someone dear to us, but because that love has already been offered to us (“in spite of everything else”), and we want to live a life that honors that unearned embrace.

A song in the tree has distracted her mind
Some other curious form of life
Has made its presence to her known
And she coos so gently, soft and low

Which one of us has not been distracted by some “song in the tree” that inspired us to look away from the things that matter most? Which one of us has not “cooed” over things that may not deserve to be cooed over? And yet, our deepest relationships have a way of patiently accommodating such distractions until the song in the tree fades and all that remains is the song in the heart.

Her shining face in a million reflections
On tiny raindrops that fall in a veil
Over our city like notes from above
It overwhelms me, just ain’t that tough

Its not that the darkness can’t touch our lives
I know it will in time, but she’s no ordinary valentine
And know when the sun goes down she sheds a darling light

The songwriter takes us beyond narcissistic obsession and “ordinary valentines” to a love that produces light and overcomes darkness. It is a love that falls like both gentle raindrops and overwhelming music. It is a love that can both radiate in a single face and cover an entire city. It is a love that illuminates even in those moments when darkness touches a life.

When I listen to this song, I am reminded that we are at our most spiritual when we are cultivating relationships that are big like the sea and gentle like soft raindrops; relationships that are mutually sacrificial and far too bright to be overcome by nighttime and shadows; relationships that tell new “stories of our possible lives” and that create new poetry with the ink of outpoured love.

Such relationships are possible, not because of our capacity to love (which is notoriously unreliable), but because of the indefatigable grace of the One who created us to need one another and who stubbornly refuses to allow our moments of hatred to have the final word. In the fullness of time, this One willingly “gave up a pearl,” becoming vulnerably and radically incarnate in “lovely bone and blood.”

In the light of such profligate love, how can I not hear in “September” the beating of a divine heart, whether the songwriter is aware of that rhythm or not?